note-a-bear:

jonesydaking:

zephr0n:

xxvalleygirlxx:

Drag em

WHERE IS THE LIE!?!?

Somebody doesn’t know there facts: Less teenagers are having sex NOW than EVER. More people are having protected sex NOW than EVER. Shut the fuck up dude

^^^^^THANKANDGODBLESS
let’s not forget, also, that CARRYING CONDOMS IS CRIMINALIZED IN LOTS OF PLACES
Specifically, it’s criminalized as a means to target sex workers. AND, because of profiling and transmisogyny and transmisogynoir, being used as a means to create a dragnet targeting non-white women and/or low-income women (of course, in this context, both of those categories are defined prejudicially and without any real regard to the women being targeted)

So…like…even if that shit WAS actually true, it’s contingent upon harming women. SPECIFICALLY. Cause lord knows cops ain’t walking around doing pocket checks on men, or men-appearing, persons at the same rate (if at all) they do to WOMEN.

***Note: I’m not trying to collapse or erase the specific effect and hazards this has on women who ARE sex workers. Because that is the ugly fucking heart of anti-condom legislation. It’s ANTI-SEX WORKER. What I’m trying to point at is that the PRIVILEGE to identify a complete stranger as a sex worker is held by cops and other state actors. And that privilege to identify women based on an almost-always arbitrary set of factors additionally impacts women who are not sex workers.
tl;dr: It affects women broadly, in addition to its SPECIFIC target group.

(Source: jaidefinichon, via legalwifi)

notlostonanadventure:

bewbin:

if u were dating a FBI agent and you dumped him.

he would be ur fed ex 

I hope the NSA people scanning my blog got a chuckle out of that

(via heart)

puto1:

puto1:

image

it’s almost spoopy time.

image

image

it’s spoopy time

image

(via clockworktimelady)

allhalebreaksloose:

interstellarmage:

i knew this guy in middle school who when asked about his future plans, even by school counselors or teachers would without fail always chant,

KICK ASS, GO TO SPACE
REPRESENT THE HUMAN RACE

i wonder what he’s up to these days.

image

(Source: viviornitier, via its-raining-british-men)

lsdzeppelin:

i was taking pictures of the new puppy

image

when i look out the window to see the older dog just

image

(via alwayslovelyalexa)

meloromantics:

appropriately-inappropriate:

audreyvhorne:

sttinkerbelle:

vmpolung:

knowledgeandlove:

Photo source

Fact check source

#and I just don’t feel entitled to someone else’s life’s work.

That comment exactly!! It’s not mine and I can survive without it, so I will.

This is why honey is not vegan.

The problem here is that honey, especially if you buy it ethically from an apiarist, isn’t actually detrimental to the well-being of the bee or the hive. In the wild, honey is used as a food stock, but in a domesticated honeybee colony, the bees are fed quite well, and so the honey is a surplus.

The alternatives, like sugar, relies on monocrops in third world countries, with transient labour. Growing up, there was a sugarcane field by my house, and I’m sure the Haitian men who worked backbreaking hours hacking a machete through knife-bladed leaves in 40 degree heat for a couple dollars a day would have traded a testicle to be a Canadian honeybee. Stevia’s going the same way, iirc.

Additionally, apiarists are actually huge proponents and activists for sustainable bee-keeping, and it’s estimated that the domesticated hive may be the last great hope for declining populations, because we can optimize their chances for survival.

It’s their life’s work, sure, but it’s not the death of them to use it responsibly.

literally read anything about the history of sugarcane and the cuban sugar industry if you think sugar is or ever has been more ethical than honey

(via rngleme)

(Source: tastefullyoffensive, via heart)